Project overview - Henrike Jost
Coalitions of Conscience: Mapping Coalition Dynamics in the EU Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence Subsystem
Research Question:
How do interest group coalitions influence the effectiveness and implementation of European human rights due diligence regulations?
Why does this research matter?
I am interested in examining the various advocacy coalitions that have sought to shape this legislation according to their interests and analyzing the strategies they employed to exert influence throughout the legislative process.
Particularly, I plan to explore the durability and stability of these coalitions, delving into the dynamics of collaboration among diverse stakeholders. I aim to understand the specific conditions and circumstances under which these coalitions successfully unite their efforts, as well as how they manage to navigate competition for limited resources and mitigate internal conflicts.
By illuminating these complex interactions, the goal is to enhance the understanding of advocacy coalition dynamics, providing valuable insights for coalition members and policy-makers. Coalition members may benefit from this better understanding by using it to inform their strategies, helping them discern the factors that contribute to the success or failure of their initiatives in influencing policy outcomes. Policymakers may use the results to come up with consensus-building strategies. Generally, the research adds to a well-applied theory and generates new knowledge on human rights due diligence laws.
Key Objectives
Paper 1
Highlighting mechanisms & contextual factors explaining varying effectiveness of mHREDD laws across different implementation contexts
Paper 2
Explaining political, institutional, and ideational factors for the (in-)stability of advocacy coalitions in contested multi-actor governance settings, such as European human rights and environmental due diligence law decision-making
Paper 3
Showing how interest group coalitions contribute to the effectiveness and implementation of European human rights and environmental due diligence regulations
Paper 4
Determining conditions for Global South actors to gain influence within human rights and environmental due diligence advocacy coalitions and mechanisms that meaningfully negotiate or transform power and resource asymmetries